My decision matrix for this design is:
Performance: ++
Manufacture: +
Aesthetic: ++
I ran my design by Oscar and cut it. Here is how it turned out:
The third piece could not go in because the edges wouldn't fit, although the size of the hole and the split were perfect. It was pretty durable in one direction, but if I exert enough force, it could be bent towards the inside because there is no third side in a different direction. I thought that it was reasonably prettier than last designs, so the actual decision matrix is:
Performance: -
Manufacturing: ++
Aesthetic: ++
Then I asked Oscar for help and we started from taping previous models together. We realized that three adjoined sides have to overlap each other in order to match up all the holes and splits. We also found out that the six sides are identical. I can construct the box by having two three-adjoined-sides together. Oscar recommended me to start from 1-inch sides. Therefore I drew another design as following:
The purple lines and black lines were for measuring purposes and were gotten rid of before printing because the first time when I had them, the laser cutter just moved rapidly without cutting anything...
Then Oscar trained me to use the electric screw driver:
It's very useful and you can use it to unscrew too.
But anyways, I eventually put together all the pieces:
Performance ++
Manufacture ++
Aesthetic + (because there is a big space left at the end of the split)
Then Oscar and I discovered that we can actually make three rectangular pieces with Kelsey's design:
My expectation for the decision matrix of this design is:
Performance +++
Manufacture ++
Aesthetic +++
Hope that I will have time to figure something out when we come back from break.



No comments:
Post a Comment